This page describes the change in wave climate parameters under different climate models and scenarios.
Climate models are used to improve understanding on climate systems by simulating the historical period , the present and also the future climate which depends on greenhouse gas scenarios. They are also used to perform seasonal forecasts. There are a number of climate models available, however, for this study 2 climate models (Mk3.5 and ECHAM5) were used under CMIP3 while 4 climate models were used under CMIP5 which were CNRM-CM5, HadGEM2-ES, INMCM4 and ACCESS1.0. These 4 models were chosen due to the availability of relatively high spatial resolution and high (3 hrs) temporal resolution data. These were also the most up to date models.
To provide some background on CMIP; CMIP stands for Coupled Model Intercomparison Project. It was first launched in 1995 under the Working Group on Coupled Modelling (WGCM) for studying the output of coupled atmosphere – ocean general circulation models. CMIP3 (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 3) was launched in the early 2000 and there were 23 coupled models developed in different countries under this project phase. This was the model ensemble for IPCC (AR4). CMIP5 (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5) was launched in early 2011 and the outputs of the climate change experiments were available in the IPCC AR5. There were 2 concentration pathways used under the CMIP5 model. These were RCP 4.5 which is a medium low emission scenario and RCP 8.5 which is high emission scenario.
Climate models do not typically include a full spectral wave model as these are too computationally expensive to be directly included. However the climate model output all the climate parameters we need to run a wave model. the wave models are run with the forcing of each climate models creating a large amopunt of wave information. For this wave climate change page, we are only showing the outputs for the CMIP5 ensemble as these were more relevant. 20 year periods were chosen for each time frame; historical (1986:2005), Mid 21st Century (MID21C, 2026:2045) and End 21st Century (END21C, 2081:2100). The ensemble average was calculated for each time frame and the difference between the projected and the historical scenarios were calculated in order to obtain the projected changes. The projected changes were calculated for 3 variable which were Significant wave height (Hs), Peak Wave Period (Tp) and Peak Wave Direction (Dp). In the slide shows below, you will be able to see the Hs changes for both scenarios (RCP 4.5 and 8.5) and only RCP8.5 changes for Dp and Tp.
The maps below show the changes in the mean significant wave height for End of 21st Century (END21C) RCP4.5 scenario.
The maps below show the changes in the mean significant wave height for End of 21st Century (END21C) RCP8.5 scenario.
The maps below show the changes in the peak wave period for End of 21st Century (END21C) RCP8.5 scenario.
The maps below show the changes in the peak wave direction for End of 21st Century (END21C) RCP8.5 scenario.
To read more about the 4 different models used under CMIP5 click on the links below:
Hemer, M., Katzey, J. and Hotan, C. (2011). The wind-wave climate of the Pacific Ocean, PACCSAP final report, Canberra: DCCEE.
Trenham, C.,Hemer, M.,Durrant, T., and Greenslade,J (2013). PACCSAP Wind-wave climate: High resolution wind-wave climate and projections of change in the Pacific region for coastal hazard assessments, Melbourne:CAWCR
Voldoire,A.,Gomez,E.,et al.(2012).The CNRM-CM5.1 Global Climate Model: Description and Basic Evaluation, France:CNRM-GAME.
CMIP5 Model HadGEM2-ES Overview
Trenham, C.,Hemer, M.,Durrant,T., and Greenslade,J.(2013). PACCSAP Wind-wave climate: High resolution wind-wave climate and projections of change in the Pacific region for coastal hazard assessments, Melbourne:CAWCR
ACCESS1-0 climate model output